Welcome to Squadra916

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing most liked content on 20/10/12 in Posts

  1. 1 point
    Ah sorry I didn't understand that you disagree the rear suspension is double wishbone. I guess you don't consider it double wishbone because each of the wishbones are made up of two unconnected links rather than a complete wishbone assemblies? There are many such suspension setups in which the wishbones are not one-piece. For example Triumph's classic Herald/Spitfire front suspension is certainly double wishbone, even though the top wishbone is made of two links. Or is it the fact that there is a toe-link in addition to the "wishbones"? Well in my view thats no different to a steering arm on a double wishbone front suspension setup - given that its purpose is to invoke the rear-wheel steering effect (so it is there to steer rather than suspend). I guess you prefer the term "multi-link"? Well in my opinion all double wishbone suspension setups are multi-link, after all they comprise more than a single link. I explain which of the links could be considered to be part of each wishbone in the section I mentioned before. The first chassis I have is 6000529. I cross checked my chassis details with eper, and if you go through the entire sequence (I've given you both the first and last chassis numbers) you will find 80747 chassis. If you are doing it manually I think that will take you quite a long time....! Please don't think I am unhappy with your comments - I'm pleased that there is some debate about the book - there will always be disagreement between enthusiasts about certain statements in a work. Thank you for buying it, and while we may disagree about certain statements in the book, I know we both appreciate these great cars!
  2. 1 point
    1.its sourced from many sites, so dont really know, as i dont really care for the 155 2.By the time i had no idea of the 2.0 V6 TB Spider, already corrected this 3. 2.0 V6 TB is not Euro 3 compliant, and the carbon emmissions are sourced from owners manual from year 2000! 4. i have included the "lower" seats in: upholstery pattern, don't know the height of the seats 5. so correct, even ferrari in mid 70's made 2.0 litre cars, and it's based on busso 12V, does not matter on which, yes discontinued on phase 3, even in late 2000 6. Source repair manual 7. i have slaved more over this amongst many wikipedia articles i have contributed, so thank You for your input http://en.wikipedia....&action=history my nick Ybsone Any more??

Welcome to Squadra916

Squadra916 is the largest international community for owners and fans of Alfa Romeo GTV and Spider 916 cars.